![]() For each new version of Workstation, I check to see if it's fixed and it's not. I informed VMWare about this problem several years ago, but it doesn't seem to be a high priority for them. You can do a search for my name in the posts. Until VMWare supports loading external LUTs in their video driver, it's just not worth the effort. ![]() I have since moved away from this and now just run my photography software and profiling software on the host only. There is a side effect in that the colors on the host (not inside the vm) will not be accurate. You can try this yourself and then see if it's repeatable. If either of those change, the profile won't be accurate. This seems to work as long as 1) The vm display is set to full screen and 2) you never change the resolution of the host or the vm. In this case the profile would be loaded on the host. My first attempt was to profile by running the profiling software on the host, but running the sensor "inside" the vm's display (to use vm's default LUT) and generate a profile based on that. In my case, I could get the color profiler software to run inside the vm, but it wouldn't load the profile afterwards. This means color calibration software, even if it works in the vm, the resulting ICC profile won't load in a VM. VMWare's video driver (used inside the VM) doesn't support external LUTs (Color Look Up Tables). Up to and including the latest version of Workstation (7.1.1): ![]() As a photographer using VMWare for many years now, I will save you some research.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |